Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann. Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen.
Leopard 1 Buff: Geht doch, WG!Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann. Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen.
Wot Leopard 1 Buff A Skin Mod for World of Tanks VideoIs the Leopard 1 Good Yet in World of Tanks? SpartanFire71, StrichmГ¤nnchen Kampf 06 January - PM, said:. The Leopard project started in November Lazio Calcio order to develop a modern tank, the Standard-Panzer, to replace the Bundeswehr's American-built M47 and M48 Patton tanks, which, though just delivered to West Germany's recently reconstituted army, were rapidly growing outdated. In this Igre Online and for the purposes of spotting, it is highly recommended to run Coated Optics, most likely in place of Vents.
Sorry if this was already stated somewhere. I haven't heard about anything of the sort, and I don't think the leo 1 needs a buff or nerf, it is extremely well balanced as it is.
I don't know if it is a joke or something, or if something is actually getting buffed. Along with a few ground resistance and turret traverse dispersion buffs.
I would much rather see a more unique Leopard with weak turret but super good gun dispersion and accuracy values, good mobility and decent camo. Remember, the Tank isn't Designed around Armor in the first place It's built around the Gun and Mobility Mobility Adjustments to the same Hidden Numbers would also Improve things, or something to aid Camo under Movement similar to a Light, but somewhere Inbetween maybe It needs to be put in the Role it's meant to have, not just another Cardboard Cutout Medium like the others It was never Meant to be like them However, after the rebalance, the Leopard 1 will still retain excellent mobility.
We also want to properly reconfigure the entire branch and check the effects of our changes on the researchable vehicles. So, the characteristics of the Pz.
At the same time, the alpha damage of the AMX 30 B will remain average. When rebalancing the characteristics of this vehicle, we constantly kept in mind that it had no distinct playing role.
The AMX 30 B is a universal second line support vehicle, which can perform equally well in a variety of game situations.
However, it lacks accuracy and armor penetration when playing at long distances, so we decided to improve these characteristics.
However, the number of these two tanks has increased in the last six months, as well as your feedback regarding their combat performance.
Therefore, we decided to reduce some of their excessively high combat parameters. Tank Nut and Gamer Wannabe! This tier 10 medium is not worth the hassles of having to lay way back and get ridiculed by team mates for "not getting in the fight".
But dam she is still a pretty looking tank. Insanefriend 2 Posted Jun 14 - Major. After the buff it's a great tank, the extra alpha and gun handling really really helped the tank.
Buff its pen and alpha make it crazy accurate and buff its camo rating done leopard 1 better. They had the right idea with up its alpha the less it had to expose itself to do the same damage was nice.
But overall im happy with the leo changes but PTA changes that tank is perfect please leave it alone. Please buff the pen and dispersion back on the amx 30 b please.
Idk about the stb 1 would like to test it. The lack of pen on the STB-1 and gun handling is still going to make that tank worthless, due to the fact that heavy tanks have thicker armor in the front and since WG, likes those corridor it would be hard to have a close fighter tank, then WG is going to nerf the movement on this tank, might as sell those STB-1 and go for the Swedes cause they will move faster, but hey I am a stupid player what do I know.
Maybe stop worrying about unique play styles and maybe just buff the tanks a bit. Also love how a Russian medium even talking about being nerfed brings out every Unicom saying we cant nerf there favorite tanks but if its tanks like tds that have no problem nerfing them and removing them.
Skip to content Home World of Tanks Supertest 1. Harkonnen Tank Nut and Gamer Wannabe! The Leopard quickly became a standard of European forces, and eventually served as the main battle tank in over a dozen countries worldwide.
Since , the Leopard 1 has gradually been relegated to secondary roles in most armies. Leopard hulls have been re-used in a wide variety of roles.
The Leopard project started in November in order to develop a modern tank, the Standard-Panzer, to replace the Bundeswehr's American-built M47 and M48 Patton tanks, which, though just delivered to West Germany's recently reconstituted army, were rapidly growing outdated.
On 25 July the detailed specifications were released; the new design needed to weigh no more than thirty metric tons, have a power-to-weight ratio of thirty horsepower per ton, be able to withstand hits by 20 mm rapid-fire guns on every side as well as operate in a battlefield contaminated with chemical weapons or radioactive fallout, the then-standard baseline for combat with the Warsaw Pact.
In addition the main armament had to consist of a mm caliber weapon the new British L7A3 mm gun was selected , carrying at least as many rounds as current US tank designs.
Mobility was the priority while firepower came second; armour was seen as less essential, as it was believed no real protection against hollow charge weapons was possible anyway.
France was very interested in the design as its own AMX 50 project had just failed. Three German Arbeitsgruppe A, B and C and one French design team would be included in a competition, with each team producing two prototypes each.
In September, Italy joined the development program. Several prototypes were entered for testing in Among the prototypes were Porsche's Model from team A, sporting a cast turret and that of team B Rheinmetall whose cast turret was somewhat higher.
Team C from Borgward, designing a very futuristic tank, failed to have a prototype ready in time.. Even before these first prototypes were finished, it had in been decided that a second phase with improved designs would be started: Team A had to build 26 phase II Prototypes for testing, team B six.
Only two tanks of the required six would actually be constructed by team B. The Porsche Prototype II was eventually selected as the winner of the contest in ; this did not come as a surprise: it had already been decided in to build a preseries of fifty vehicles based on this design; production of these was started that very year.
This "0-series" was modified with a new cast turret and several hull changes to raise the rear deck to provide more room in the engine compartment, and move some of the radiators to the upper sides of the hull.
Before mass production of the standard version started it was also decided to add an optical range-finding system for better long-range gunnery, which required the turret to be somewhat taller, and added "bumps" on either side of the turret to mount the optics for triangulation.
Production was set up at Krauss-Maffei of Munich from early onward, with deliveries of the first batch between September, and July,